distanced himself from Thatcher's belief that public sector borrowing should be reduced in times of recession.That's not a small thing.
"The commonwealth was not yet lost in Tiberius's days, but it was already doomed and Rome knew it. The fundamental trouble could not be cured. In Italy, labor could not support life..." - Vladimir Simkhovitch, "Rome's Fall Reconsidered"
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
I'm not a fan of "diagrams" in economics, but sometimes... This is a screen capture of slide 36 from a SlideShare presentatio...
-
JW Mason : "... in retrospect it is clear that we should have been talking about big new public spending programs to boost demand....
-
Bosch season five air date: 18 April. Ten episodes. Four days later, six of the transcripts were already available. A few days later, the ...
-
Mark Thoma links to the Kansas City Fed's Nominal Wage Rigidities and the Future Path of Wage Growth by José Mustre-del-Río and Emily ...
-
First, this summary of an observation made in 1850, from the Liberty Fund : Frédéric Bastiat, while pondering the nature of war, concluded ...
1 comment:
From the Google Books blurb on Milton Friedman's Money Mischief:
"In this “lively, enlightening introduction to monetary history” (Kirkus Reviews), one of the leading figures of the Chicago school of economics that rejected the theories of John Maynard Keynes offers a journey through history to illustrate the importance of understanding monetary economics..."
Yeah, yeah. But it doesn't really sound like Friedman "rejected the theories of John Maynard Keynes" if, in his evidence to a House of Commons Select Committee he rejected the view that "public sector borrowing should be reduced in times of recession".
If you look thru Free to Choose and Money Mischief, you will see additional evidence that Friedman did not flat out reject the theories of Keynes.
He wasn't that stupid.
Post a Comment