Our objectives conflict. We want more growth, but not more inflation. However, when growth goes up, prices go up too. And when growth goes down, prices go down. Or at least that's how it used to work.
These days it's more like this: When growth goes up, inflation goes up; and when growth goes down, inflation goes down. This is not really the same thing, but that doesn't seem to bother anyone.
It should. It should bother you. It is a fundamental change in the way the economy works. But economists and commentators just use the word "inflation" now in place of the word "prices", and proceed as if nothing had changed.
Maybe we should try to figure out why that change occurred. Maybe that would help us understand the economic problem.
//
Here, I'll give you a hint. Instead of going up and down, prices go up more and go up less, but always go up. HINT: There is more cost now, more than there was when prices went up and down. There is more cost now.
What is that cost?
//
Here, I'll give you another hint: The cost of finance.
"The commonwealth was not yet lost in Tiberius's days, but it was already doomed and Rome knew it. The fundamental trouble could not be cured. In Italy, labor could not support life..." - Vladimir Simkhovitch, "Rome's Fall Reconsidered"
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
I'm not a fan of "diagrams" in economics, but sometimes... This is a screen capture of slide 36 from a SlideShare presentatio...
-
JW Mason : "... in retrospect it is clear that we should have been talking about big new public spending programs to boost demand.&quo...
-
Bosch season five air date: 18 April. Ten episodes. Four days later, six of the transcripts were already available. A few days later, the ...
-
First, this summary of an observation made in 1850, from the Liberty Fund : Frédéric Bastiat, while pondering the nature of war, concluded ...
-
In the Google News this morning, "The Fed may have saved the economy by hiking rates for 18 months—and may have guaranteed crisis for...
No comments:
Post a Comment