Were I to mention that economists used to say our economy's post-WWII "golden age" ended in 1974, and that these days they act as if that golden age never existed, would you think me crazy?
Surely on this evidence, you would:
This does not show what economists think, but what everyone thinks whose opinion ended up in any book Google could get its virtual hands on. It's not even about the golden age of our economy, but just about the words "golden age".
Nonetheless, I cannot help but point out the increase in the 1950s and the high plateau in the 1960s, during the golden age, and the decline in the 1970s. And the relative low since then, with however a little bump during the "macroeconomic miracle" of the mid-to-late 1990s. The ups and downs of the graph match perfectly the ups and downs of the US economy, despite the real or imagined irrelevance of the ngram data and the real or imagined relevance of economic performance to discussion of a golden age.
"The commonwealth was not yet lost in Tiberius's days, but it was already doomed and Rome knew it. The fundamental trouble could not be cured. In Italy, labor could not support life..." - Vladimir Simkhovitch, "Rome's Fall Reconsidered"
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
I'm not a fan of "diagrams" in economics, but sometimes... This is a screen capture of slide 36 from a SlideShare presentatio...
-
JW Mason : "... in retrospect it is clear that we should have been talking about big new public spending programs to boost demand.&quo...
-
Bosch season five air date: 18 April. Ten episodes. Four days later, six of the transcripts were already available. A few days later, the ...
-
First, this summary of an observation made in 1850, from the Liberty Fund : Frédéric Bastiat, while pondering the nature of war, concluded ...
-
In the Google News this morning, "The Fed may have saved the economy by hiking rates for 18 months—and may have guaranteed crisis for...
No comments:
Post a Comment